GSAC Softball 2008
Team Statistics
Overall Statistics
GSAC Softball 2008
GSAC Overall Statistics (as of May 12, 2008)
(All games Sorted by Batting avg)
Team AVG G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI TB SLG% BB HBP SO GDP OB% SF SH SB-ATT PO A E FLD%
Piedmont College.... .325 41 1088 264 354 51 12 5 221 444 .408 140 15 164 1 .403 20 36 122-137 803 349 61 .950
Maryville College... .315 36 1011 209 318 55 8 4 173 401 .397 74 19 174 2 .369 10 33 65-73 703 323 49 .954
Spelman College..... .283 21 487 97 138 18 5 3 59 175 .359 37 5 123 0 .340 0 7 39-44 339 164 71 .876
LaGrange College.... .283 45 1216 173 344 43 3 7 138 414 .340 67 16 182 6 .327 7 26 34-45 889 389 71 .947
Huntingdon College.. .273 42 1112 190 304 54 9 11 164 409 .368 80 18 202 1 .330 8 40 76-82 826 406 70 .946
Wesleyan College.... .219 35 810 89 177 23 5 5 74 225 .278 60 19 210 3 .288 1 13 32-39 614 254 99 .898
Agnes Scott College. .131 14 245 14 32 3 1 2 8 43 .176 19 5 88 1 .208 0 2 6-11 190 94 55 .838
Totals.............. .279 5969 1667 43 837 .354 97 14 46 374-431 1979 .930
234 1036 247 37 2111 477 1143 .340 157 4364 476
CI - LaGrange 1, Spelman 1, Maryville 1.
(All games Sorted by Earned run avg)
Team ERA W-L G CG SHO/CBO SV IP H R ER BB SO 2B 3B HR AB B/Avg WP HBP BK SFA SHA
LaGrange College.... 2.72 25-20 45 24 8/2 3 296.1 336 164 115 68 168 48 11 7 1181 .285 21 12 2 10 39
Huntingdon College.. 2.80 16-25 42 24 6/2 0 275.1 288 174 110 91 189 43 8 6 1084 .266 30 25 0 10 49
Maryville College... 2.87 19-16 36 22 2/0 0 234.1 286 137 96 46 123 38 0 6 939 .305 11 12 0 4 49
Piedmont College.... 2.96 28-13 41 36 3/0 0 267.2 328 148 113 47 163 35 10 12 1109 .296 13 3 0 9 37
Wesleyan College.... 6.40 5-28 35 22 1/1 0 204.2 342 270 187 77 134 51 14 7 987 .347 25 13 0 15 15
Spelman College..... 8.24 5-15 21 17 0/0 0 113.0 205 191 133 83 53 35 3 11 536 .382 24 20 1 13 10
Agnes Scott College. 11.27 0-14 14 13 0/0 0 63.1 205 200 102 44 27 29 13 5 419 .489 29 10 0 3 7
Totals.............. 4.12 234 20/5 1454.2 1284 456 279 54 .318 95 64
98-131 158 3 1990 856 857 59 6255 153 3 206
PB - Wesleyan 34, Agnes Scott 34, Spelman 28, Piedmont 10, Huntingdon 10, LaGrange 9, Maryville 7. Pickoffs - Maryville 1,
LaGrange 1, Huntingdon 1, Piedmont 1.
(All games Sorted by Fielding pct)
Team C PO A E FLD% DPs SBA CSB SBA% PB CI
Maryville College... 1075 703 323 49 .954 12 52 12 .813 7 1
Piedmont College.... 1213 803 349 61 .950 6 30 7 .811 10 0
LaGrange College.... 1349 889 389 71 .947 6 53 16 .768 9 1
Huntingdon College.. 1302 826 406 70 .946 4 47 10 .825 10 0
Wesleyan College.... 967 614 254 99 .898 6 118 0 1.000 34 0
Spelman College..... 574 339 164 71 .876 5 60 11 .845 28 1
Agnes Scott College. 339 190 94 55 .838 2 52 2 .963 34 0
Totals.............. 6819 1979 .930 411 .876 3
4364 476 41 58 132
Category Leaders
GSAC Softball 2008
GSAC Batting Leaders (as of May 12, 2008)
(All games)
Hitting minimums - 50% of Games 2.0 AB/Game
Pitching minimums - 1.0 IP/Game
Batting avg
-----------
1. Piedmont College.... .325
2. Maryville College... .315
3. Spelman College..... .283
4. LaGrange College.... .283
5. Huntingdon College.. .273
Slugging pct
------------
1. Piedmont College.... .408
2. Maryville College... .397
3. Huntingdon College.. .368
4. Spelman College..... .359
5. LaGrange College.... .340
On base pct
-----------
1. Piedmont College.... .403
2. Maryville College... .369
3. Spelman College..... .340
4. Huntingdon College.. .330
5. LaGrange College.... .327
Runs scored
-----------
1. Piedmont College.... 264
2. Maryville College... 209
3. Huntingdon College.. 190
4. LaGrange College.... 173
5. Spelman College..... 97
Hits
----
1. Piedmont College.... 354
2. LaGrange College.... 344
3. Maryville College... 318
4. Huntingdon College.. 304
5. Wesleyan College.... 177
Runs batted in
--------------
1. Piedmont College.... 221
2. Maryville College... 173
3. Huntingdon College.. 164
4. LaGrange College.... 138
5. Wesleyan College.... 74
Doubles
-------
1. Maryville College... 55
2. Huntingdon College.. 54
3. Piedmont College.... 51
4. LaGrange College.... 43
5. Wesleyan College.... 23
Triples
-------
1. Piedmont College.... 12
2. Huntingdon College.. 9
3. Maryville College... 8
4. Wesleyan College.... 5
Spelman College..... 5
Home runs
---------
1. Huntingdon College.. 11
2. LaGrange College.... 7
3. Wesleyan College.... 5
Piedmont College.... 5
5. Maryville College... 4
Total bases
-----------
1. Piedmont College.... 444
2. LaGrange College.... 414
3. Huntingdon College.. 409
4. Maryville College... 401
5. Wesleyan College.... 225
Total plate appearances
-----------------------
1. LaGrange College.... 1333
2. Piedmont College.... 1300
3. Huntingdon College.. 1258
4. Maryville College... 1147
5. Wesleyan College.... 903
At bats
-------
1. LaGrange College.... 1216
2. Huntingdon College.. 1112
3. Piedmont College.... 1088
4. Maryville College... 1011
5. Wesleyan College.... 810
Walks
-----
1. Piedmont College.... 140
2. Huntingdon College.. 80
3. Maryville College... 74
4. LaGrange College.... 67
5. Wesleyan College.... 60
Hit by pitch
------------
1. Wesleyan College.... 19
Maryville College... 19
3. Huntingdon College.. 18
4. LaGrange College.... 16
5. Piedmont College.... 15
Strikeouts
----------
1. Wesleyan College.... 210
2. Huntingdon College.. 202
3. LaGrange College.... 182
4. Maryville College... 174
5. Piedmont College.... 164
Sac bunts
---------
1. Huntingdon College.. 40
2. Piedmont College.... 36
3. Maryville College... 33
4. LaGrange College.... 26
5. Wesleyan College.... 13
Sac flies
---------
1. Piedmont College.... 20
2. Maryville College... 10
3. Huntingdon College.. 8
4. LaGrange College.... 7
5. Wesleyan College.... 1
Stolen bases
------------
1. Piedmont College.... 122
2. Huntingdon College.. 76
3. Maryville College... 65
4. Spelman College..... 39
5. LaGrange College.... 34
Caught stealing
---------------
1. Piedmont College.... 15
2. LaGrange College.... 11
3. Maryville College... 8
4. Wesleyan College.... 7
5. Huntingdon College.. 6
Steal attempts
--------------
1. Piedmont College.... 137
2. Huntingdon College.. 82
3. Maryville College... 73
4. LaGrange College.... 45
5. Spelman College..... 44
Grounded into DP
----------------
1. LaGrange College.... 6
2. Wesleyan College.... 3
3. Maryville College... 2
4. 3 tied at........... 1
GSAC Softball 2008
GSAC Pitching Leaders (as of May 12, 2008)
(All games)
Hitting minimums - 50% of Games 2.0 AB/Game
Pitching minimums - 1.0 IP/Game
Earned run avg
--------------
1. LaGrange College.... 2.72
2. Huntingdon College.. 2.80
3. Maryville College... 2.87
4. Piedmont College.... 2.96
5. Wesleyan College.... 6.40
Opposing bat avg
----------------
1. Huntingdon College.. .266
2. LaGrange College.... .285
3. Piedmont College.... .296
4. Maryville College... .305
5. Wesleyan College.... .347
Innings pitched
---------------
1. LaGrange College.... 296.1
2. Huntingdon College.. 275.1
3. Piedmont College.... 267.2
4. Maryville College... 234.1
5. Wesleyan College.... 204.2
Batters struck out
------------------
1. Huntingdon College.. 189
2. LaGrange College.... 168
3. Piedmont College.... 163
4. Wesleyan College.... 134
5. Maryville College... 123
Batters SO out looking
----------------------
1. LaGrange College.... 61
2. Maryville College... 45
3. Huntingdon College.. 31
4. Piedmont College.... 22
5. Wesleyan College.... 8
Wins
----
1. Piedmont College.... 28
2. LaGrange College.... 25
3. Maryville College... 19
4. Huntingdon College.. 16
5. 2 tied at........... 5
Losses
------
1. Wesleyan College.... 28
2. Huntingdon College.. 25
3. LaGrange College.... 20
4. Maryville College... 16
5. Spelman College..... 15
Saves
-----
1. LaGrange College.... 3
Runners picked off
------------------
1. Maryville College... 1
Piedmont College.... 1
Huntingdon College.. 1
LaGrange College.... 1
Sac bunts allowed
-----------------
1. Huntingdon College.. 49
Maryville College... 49
3. LaGrange College.... 39
4. Piedmont College.... 37
5. Wesleyan College.... 15
Sac flies allowed
-----------------
1. Wesleyan College.... 15
2. Spelman College..... 13
3. Huntingdon College.. 10
LaGrange College.... 10
5. Piedmont College.... 9
Hits allowed
------------
1. Spelman College..... 205
Agnes Scott College. 205
3. Maryville College... 286
4. Huntingdon College.. 288
5. Piedmont College.... 328
Runs allowed
------------
1. Maryville College... 137
2. Piedmont College.... 148
3. LaGrange College.... 164
4. Huntingdon College.. 174
5. Spelman College..... 191
Earned runs allowed
-------------------
1. Maryville College... 96
2. Agnes Scott College. 102
3. Huntingdon College.. 110
4. Piedmont College.... 113
5. LaGrange College.... 115
Walks allowed
-------------
1. Agnes Scott College. 44
2. Maryville College... 46
3. Piedmont College.... 47
4. LaGrange College.... 68
5. Wesleyan College.... 77
Doubles allowed
---------------
1. Agnes Scott College. 29
2. Piedmont College.... 35
Spelman College..... 35
4. Maryville College... 38
5. Huntingdon College.. 43
Triples allowed
---------------
1. Maryville College... 0
2. Spelman College..... 3
3. Huntingdon College.. 8
4. Piedmont College.... 10
5. LaGrange College.... 11
Home runs allowed
-----------------
1. Agnes Scott College. 5
2. Maryville College... 6
Huntingdon College.. 6
4. LaGrange College.... 7
Wesleyan College.... 7
Wild pitches
------------
1. Huntingdon College.. 30
2. Agnes Scott College. 29
3. Wesleyan College.... 25
4. Spelman College..... 24
5. LaGrange College.... 21
Balks
-----
1. LaGrange College.... 2
2. Spelman College..... 1
Hit batters
-----------
1. Huntingdon College.. 25
2. Spelman College..... 20
3. Wesleyan College.... 13
4. Maryville College... 12
LaGrange College.... 12
Intentional BB allowed
----------------------
GSAC Softball 2008
GSAC Fielding Leaders (as of May 12, 2008)
(All games)
Hitting minimums - 50% of Games
Pitching minimums - 1.0 IP/Game
Fielding pct
------------
1. Maryville College... .954
2. Piedmont College.... .950
3. LaGrange College.... .947
4. Huntingdon College.. .946
5. Wesleyan College.... .898
Chances
-------
1. LaGrange College.... 1349
2. Huntingdon College.. 1302
3. Piedmont College.... 1213
4. Maryville College... 1075
5. Wesleyan College.... 967
Putouts
-------
1. LaGrange College.... 889
2. Huntingdon College.. 826
3. Piedmont College.... 803
4. Maryville College... 703
5. Wesleyan College.... 614
Assists
-------
1. Huntingdon College.. 406
2. LaGrange College.... 389
3. Piedmont College.... 349
4. Maryville College... 323
5. Wesleyan College.... 254
Errors
------
1. Wesleyan College.... 99
2. LaGrange College.... 71
Spelman College..... 71
4. Huntingdon College.. 70
5. Piedmont College.... 61
Fielding double plays
---------------------
1. Maryville College... 12
2. LaGrange College.... 6
Piedmont College.... 6
Wesleyan College.... 6
5. Spelman College..... 5
Stolen bases against
--------------------
1. Wesleyan College.... 118
2. Spelman College..... 60
3. LaGrange College.... 53
4. Agnes Scott College. 52
Maryville College... 52
Caught stealing by
------------------
1. LaGrange College.... 16
2. Maryville College... 12
3. Spelman College..... 11
4. Huntingdon College.. 10
5. Piedmont College.... 7
Steal attempts against
----------------------
1. Wesleyan College.... 118
2. Spelman College..... 71
3. LaGrange College.... 69
4. Maryville College... 64
5. Huntingdon College.. 57
Passed balls
------------
1. Wesleyan College.... 34
Agnes Scott College. 34
3. Spelman College..... 28
4. Huntingdon College.. 10
Piedmont College.... 10
Catchers interference
---------------------
1. LaGrange College.... 1
Maryville College... 1
Spelman College..... 1